So, in order to help you as much as possible, I decided to put together the tables you can see below. They are not meant to replace my reviews - where you can find much more details about specific things (for instance, if you are a portrait photographer, you might need some features that a landscape photographer does not). Another important disclaimer: unlike my reviews, where products are used enough, often in actual assignment (i.e. pro) conditions, and safe conclusions can be drawn, I have not extensively used all of the products you see in the tables below. But I have at least tried them for a while - the neighborhood camera store is kind enough to let me check their demo products for a few hours at a time with no charge. In any case, the comparison tables offer you just that: a very quick comparison tool - basically I do the hard work of picking out the important specs and, with the help of my experience, giving you a quick comment to help you draw conclusions. Cameras missing from the list are cameras I have not tried at all.
If you found this useful, please consider sharing this page by using the social media buttons found below. Thanks!
Note: The results are not comparable across categories. For instance, an "XL-sized" camera is considered as such only in comparison to other cameras of the same category. Notice also how each category has different features that count as 'Important'.
Note: The results are not comparable across categories. For instance, an "XL-sized" camera is considered as such only in comparison to other cameras of the same category. Notice also how each category has different features that count as 'Important'.
Entry-level DSLR cameras
| ||||||
Camera
|
Important Features
|
Comment
| ||||
AF Motor
|
Flash Commander
|
Sensor Resolution
|
Size & weight
|
Ergonomics
| ||
D70/D70s
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Low
|
XL
|
Very Good
|
Skip. Old sensor & tech, small screen. Has AF motor. Dual Control Wheel
|
D50
|
Yes
|
No
|
Low
|
L
|
Average
|
Skip. Old sensor & tech, small screen. Has AF motor.
|
D40/D40x/D60/D3000
|
No
|
No
|
Low
|
S
|
Average
|
Probably Skip. Unless if very cheap.
|
D3100
|
No
|
No
|
Average
|
S
|
Average
|
Still Good. A fine, capable camera (for its class)
|
No
|
No
|
High
|
S
|
Average
|
Fine. The smallest Nikon DSLRs with modern sensors.
| |
D5000/D5100
|
No
|
No
|
Average
|
M
|
Good
|
Still Good. Fine, capable cameras. Not as great value as the D3100 though (either get the D3100 on a budget, or the D5200/D5300 if you can afford it)
|
No
|
No
|
High
|
M
|
Good
|
Fine. The best entry-level Nikon DSLRs with modern sensors in terms of features (sensor-wise the D3200/D3300 is the same thing really)
|
Mid-level DSLR cameras
| ||||||
Camera
|
Important Features
|
Comment
| ||||
AIS Lens Metering?
|
Flash Commander
|
Sensor Resolution
|
Size & weight
|
Ergonomics
| ||
D100
|
No
|
No
|
Low
|
L
|
Poor
|
Definitely Skip. Old sensor & tech, small screen. Obsolete ergonomics. Obsolete flash. Has AF motor.
|
D80
|
No
|
Yes
|
Average
|
S
|
Good
|
Probably Skip. Nothing wrong with it essentially, but the D90 is far better for not much more money.
|
D90
|
No
|
Yes
|
Average
|
S
|
Very Good
|
Still Good. A fine, capable camera (for the right price). All the important features are there (except AIS lens metering).
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
High
|
M
|
Very Good
|
Fine. A great camera, selling (used) for very low prices.
| |
Yes
|
Yes
|
High
|
M
|
Very Good
|
Fine. An even better camera, as it has a newer sensor
|
Upper-level DSLR cameras
| ||||||
Camera
|
Important Features
|
Comment
| ||||
FX/DX
|
Speed (buffer, AF, fps)
|
Camera aimed mostly for:
|
Size/ Weight
|
Body Toughness
| ||
D200
|
DX
|
OK
|
General Photography
|
M
|
Good
|
Probably Skip. Unless if very cheap. Still OK, but the D300 is far better for not much more.
|
D2x
|
DX
|
OK fps; Superb AF & buffer
|
Studio; portraits at base ISO
|
L
|
Superb
|
Still Good if used only below ISO 400. Skip if used above ISO 400
|
D300
|
DX
|
Very Good
|
General Photography
|
M
|
Good
|
Still Good. Great value. Tough body, with lots of features and control, and an OK sensor (with care >800 ISO)
|
FX
|
Very Good buffer & AF, OK fps
|
General Photography; Superb for low light
|
M
|
Very Good
|
Fine. Tough body, all the features/control you truly need, and a superb sensor, consistent across the ISO range. Great value (used)
| |
D3 (not including –s or –x models)
|
FX
|
Excellent
|
General Photography; sports; same sensor as D700, superb for low light
|
L
|
Superb
|
Fine. Tougher (and bigger) than the D700, with the same sensor. Great value (used)
|
FX
|
Very Good
|
Like the D700, only newer, slightly better sensor.
|
S
|
Average
|
Fine. Better sensor than the D700/D3, but inferior body
| |
D800 (not including –E model)
|
FX
|
Very Good AF & buffer; poor fps
|
Landscape, high-resolution scenes.
|
M
|
Very Good
|
Fine. A tough pro body, with lots of features and a huge-resolution sensor (=superb for landscapes, unsuitable for sports). If you're considering such a camera, you ought to look at the new D810 instead.
|